Delivery to: 123 Smith Street Sydney NSW 2023

New Releases
Two Hundred Years War
Publisher:
Bloomsbury Publishing (AUS)

Two Hundred Years War

The Bloody Crowns of England and France, 1292–1492

3.5 (154) Write A Review

Payment options
Card PayPal afterpay

Description

["An exciting, radically different take on the most important conflict of the Middle Ages.","Through the lens of France, Livingston considers a longer timespan which includes earlier Anglo-French conflicts as well as other rival European powers.","As page-turningly readable as it is scholarly and rigorous.","Author is a renowned, much-admired expert on medieval warfare.","Will stand alongside Dan Jones’s Henry V<\/i> as a must-read medieval narrative history.","MARKET: Jonathan Sumption, Desmond Seward, Marc Morris and Dan Jones","Dr Michael Livingston<\/b> is a Citadel Distinguished Professor and teaches the military and cultural history of the Middle Ages at The Citadel, the Military College of South Carolina. In 2024 he was shortlisted for the Crown Award for Agincourt: Battle of the Scarred King. <\/i>He co-authored the textbook reader Medieval Warfare<\/i>, winner of the 2020 Distinguished Book Prize. These add to previous books The Battle of Crécy: A Casebook<\/i>, winner of the 2017 Distinguished Book Award from the Society for Military History, Never Greater Slaughter: Brunanburh and the Birth of England<\/i> (Osprey, 2021), and Crécy: Battle of Five Kings<\/i> (Osprey, 2021). He is an elected Fellow of the Royal Historical Society and former Secretary-General for the United States Commission on Military History.","

A new and radically original account of the longest military conflict in European history, which challenges the conventional periodisation of the ‘Hundred Years War’ to consider a much longer period of Anglo-French conflict.
<\/b>
Michael Livingston argues that the English lens through which the war has been viewed has led historians to define it in terms of English interests (most famously, the claim of the English Plantagenet king Edward III to be the rightful king of France), and that the events collectively labelled the ‘Hundred Years War’ are best seen as a sequence of steps in France’s struggle to define itself as a nation. For much of the period, France’s primary rival was indeed England. But it was by no means the only combatant. Burgundy stood in its way, too, as did Brittany, Flanders, Navarre and other rival powers.

Viewing France as the primary engine driving the war leads Livingston to consider a much longer timespan, starting with the Anglo-French ‘Pirate War’ of 1292 (which swiftly escalated into a fight over England’s feudal possessions in Gascony) and ending with the marriage of Charles VIII of France to Anne of Brittany by which Brittany was subsumed into the French realm.<\/p>","A brand-new history of the 14th and 15th century conflicts between England and France – original in approach and radical in its conclusions – that significantly broadens traditional narratives of the events historians have collectively labelled the Hundred Years War.","A riveting page-turner that brilliantly revises centuries of history","He's done it again! Livingston upends our traditional understanding of history, while simultaneously telling a cracking tale.","Livingston very bravely challenges the accepted narrative of the Hundred Years War — and its many myths. The best single-volume history of the Hundred Years War.","Makes the reader feel like they’re experiencing history that is fresh, new and exhilarating.","

[A] lively new account... The complex narrative is deftly handled, and Livingston’s is an engaging, sometimes thrilling introduction to an epic conflict whose historiography has been fought over almost as much as the poor ravaged territories of western France<\/p>","

Praise for Michael Livingston:<\/b>

Fascinating and engaging, and told with clear passion for the subject.<\/p>","Original, insightful and revelatory.","A brand-new history of the 14th and 15th century conflicts between England and France – original in approach and radical in its conclusions – that significantly broadens traditional narratives of the events historians have collectively labelled the Hundred Years War."]